Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTan, Xincai Catoen
dc.contributor.authorXu, Yuchunen
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jianen
dc.contributor.authorCurran, Rickyen
dc.contributor.authorRaghunathan, Srinivasanen
dc.contributor.authorGove, Daviden
dc.contributor.authorDoherty, Johnen
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-19T09:12:04Z
dc.date.available2013-06-19T09:12:04Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationTan, X. et al. (2008) Cost-efficient materials in aerospace: composite vs aluminium. In: Curran, R., Chou, S. Y. and Trappey, A. (eds.) Collaborative product and service life cycle management for a sustainable world: proceedings of the 15th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering (CE2008), Belfast, August 2008. London: Springer-Verlag, pp. 259-266.en
dc.identifier.isbn9781848009714
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2086/8758
dc.description.abstractAluminium alloys are a series of traditional materials applied in aerospace industry. Composite materials have been being used to replace some aluminium alloys in airframe structures. To select a cost-efficient material in aerospace design, a framework for systematic assessment of composites and aluminium is therefore suggested. Through evaluation of 3Ps which represent prices, properties and processing of material, life cycle assessment of aluminium and composite could be made. By comparison of and trade-off the listed baselines of 3Ps, an economic, rational, available and useful material can be logically selected.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag.en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAdvanced Concurrent Engineering;
dc.titleCost-efficient materials in aerospace: composite vs aluminium.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-972-1_25
dc.peerreviewedYesen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record