Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavies, Jonathan S.en
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-05T15:35:45Z
dc.date.available2012-12-05T15:35:45Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationDavies, J.S. (2012) Network Governance Theory: A Gramscian Critique. Environment and Planning A, 44 (11), pp. 2687-2704.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2086/7855
dc.description.abstractInfluential governance theories argue that we live increasingly in a world of networks, either relegating hierarchy to the shadows or dismissing it altogether. This paper develops a Gramscian critique of these currents, advancing two key arguments. First, drawing on Gramsci’s concepts of hegemony and passive revolution, it reinterprets the cultivation of networks as a prominent element in the hegemonic strategies of Western neoliberalism, exemplified by UK public policy. Second, however, governing networks struggle to cultivate trust, relying instead on hierarchy and closure. The paper argues that network governance can therefore be understood as a form of Gramsci’s integral state, a concept which highlights both the continuing centrality of coercion in the governance system and the limits of the networks project. It concludes that conceiving of urban governing networks as micro-configurations of the integral state offers a distinctive way of overcoming the ‘government to governance’ dualism.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPionen
dc.subjectnetwork governanceen
dc.subjecthegemonyen
dc.subjectdominationen
dc.subjectneoliberalismen
dc.subjectintegral stateen
dc.titleNetwork Governance Theory: A Gramscian Critiqueen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a4585
dc.peerreviewedYesen
dc.ref2014.selected1364985681_9611640000146_19_1


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record