Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRichards, Annaen
dc.contributor.authorSen, Barbaraen
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-05T12:31:06Z
dc.date.available2018-06-05T12:31:06Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationRichards A. and, Sen B. (2013) An investigation into the viability of LibraryThing for promotional and user engagement purposes in libraries. Library Hi Tech, 31 (3), pp. 493-519en
dc.identifier.urihttp://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/78385/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2086/16249
dc.description.abstractPurpose – LibraryThing is a Web 2.0 tool allowing users to catalogue books using data drawn from sources such as Amazon and the Library of Congress and has facilities such as tagging and interest groups. This study seeks to evaluate whether LibraryThing is a valuable tool for libraries to use for promotional and user engagement purposes. Design/methodology/approach – This study used a sequential mixed methods three-phase design: the identification of LibraryThing features for user engagement or promotional purposes, exploratory semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire. Findings – Several uses of LibraryThing for promotional and user engagement purposes were identified. The most popular reason libraries used LibraryThing was to promote the library or library stock, with most respondents using it specifically to highlight collections of books. Monitoring of patron usage was low and many respondents had not received any feedback. LibraryThing was commonly reported as being easy to use, remotely accessible, and having low cost, whilst its main drawbacks were the 200 book limit for free accounts, and it being a third-party site. The majority of respondents felt LibraryThing was a useful tool for libraries. Practical implications – LibraryThing has most value as a promotional tool for libraries. Libraries should actively monitor patron usage of their LibraryThing account or request user feedback to ensure that LibraryThing provides a truly valuable service for their library. Orginality/value – There is little research on the value of LibraryThing for libraries, or librarians' perceptions of LibraryThing as a Web 2.0 tool.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Limiteden
dc.subjectLibraryThingen
dc.subjectlibrariesen
dc.subjectWeb 2.0en
dc.titleAn investigation into the viability of LibraryThing for promotional and user engagement purposes in librariesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0034
dc.peerreviewedYesen
dc.explorer.multimediaNoen
dc.funderFunding for Anna Richards' Masters degree, during which this research was completed, was received via an AHRC Studentship.en
dc.projectidN/Aen
dc.cclicenceCC-BY-NCen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record