Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClifton, Andrewen
dc.contributor.authorAdams, C.en
dc.contributor.authorClark Wells, N.en
dc.contributor.authorJones, Hannahen
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, J.en
dc.contributor.authorTosh, G.en
dc.contributor.authorCallaghan, P.en
dc.contributor.authorLiddle, P.en
dc.contributor.authorBollang, G.en
dc.contributor.authorFurtadoe, V.en
dc.contributor.authorKhokhar, M. A.en
dc.contributor.authorAggarwalg, V.en
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-31T10:23:52Z
dc.date.available2017-10-31T10:23:52Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-16
dc.identifier.citationAdams et al. (2018) Monitoring oral health of people in Early Intervention for Psychosis teams: The extended Three Shires randomised trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 77, pp. 106-114en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2086/14767
dc.descriptionThe file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.en
dc.description.abstractBackground The British Society for Disability and Oral Health guidelines made recommendations for oral health care for people with mental health problems, including providing oral health advice, support, promotion and education. The effectiveness of interventions based on these guidelines on oral health-related outcomes in mental health service users is untested. Objective To acquire basic data on the oral health of people with or at risk of serious mental illness. To determine the effects of an oral health checklist in routine clinical practice. Design: Clinician and service user-designed cluster randomised trial. Settings and Participants The trial compared a simple form for monitoring oral health care with standard care (no form) for outcomes relevant to service use and dental health behaviour for people with suspected psychosis in Mid and North England. Thirty-five teams were divided into two groups and recruited across 2012-3 with one year follow up. Results 18 intervention teams returned 882 baseline intervention forms and 274 outcome sheets one year later (31%). Control teams (n=17) returned 366 baseline forms. For the proportion for which data were available at one year we found no significant differences for any outcomes between those allocated to the initial monitoring checklist and people in the control group (Registered with dentist (p=0.44), routine check-up within last year (p= 0.18), owning a toothbrush (p= 0.99), cleaning teeth twice a day (p=0.68), requiring urgent dental treatment (p=0.11). Conclusion This trial provides no clear evidence that Care Co-ordinators (largely nursing staff) using an oral health checklist improves oral health behaviour or oral health state in those thought to be at risk of psychosis or with early psychosis.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.subjectcheck-listsen
dc.subjectnursesen
dc.subjectoral healthen
dc.subjectpsychosisen
dc.subjectrandomised controlled trialen
dc.titleMonitoring oral health of people in Early Intervention for Psychosis teams: The extended Three Shires randomised trialen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.005
dc.peerreviewedYesen
dc.explorer.multimediaNoen
dc.funderNIHRen
dc.projectidN/Aen
dc.cclicenceCC-BY-NC-NDen
dc.date.acceptance2017-10-10en
dc.researchinstituteInstitute of Health, Health Policy and Social Careen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record