Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHeywood, Paulen
dc.contributor.authorRose, Jonathanen
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-07T10:58:05Z
dc.date.available2017-03-07T10:58:05Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationHeywood, P. M., and Rose, J. (2015) Curbing Corruption or Promoting Integrity? Probing the Hidden Conceptual Challenge. In: Peter Hardi, Paul M. Heywood, and Davide Torsello (Eds.) Debates of Corruption and Integrity. Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 102-119en
dc.identifier.isbn9781137427632
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2086/13439
dc.description.abstractFor decades corruption has been the primary means through which we have understood unethical behaviour in public life. This has resulted in a helpful focus upon eliminating the worst behaviours from public life. Nonetheless, corruption is conceptually limited if our overarching goal is to increase ethical behaviour more widely, rather than only to reduce the worst of behaviours. Indeed, a focus on corruption does not allow for any consideration of pro-social behaviours at all. This chapter argues that simply being 'not corrupt' is too low of a bar for judging the actions of governors.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPalgraveen
dc.subjectPoliticsen
dc.subjectIntegrityen
dc.subjectEthicsen
dc.titleCurbing Corruption or Promoting Integrity? Probing the Hidden Conceptual Challengeen
dc.typeBook chapteren
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137427649_6
dc.funderN/Aen
dc.projectidN/Aen
dc.cclicenceN/Aen
dc.researchinstituteLocal Governance Research Centre (LGRC)en


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record