Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaker, Estellaen
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-30T09:29:05Z
dc.date.available2016-11-30T09:29:05Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationBaker, E. (2016) Crimes, remedies and videotape; An unhappy encounter with EU law? In: R. Colson and S. Field (eds) EU Criminal Justice and the Challenges of Legal Diversity: Towards a Socio-Legal Approach to EU Criminal Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 241-267en
dc.identifier.isbn9781107096585
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2086/13022
dc.description.abstractThe chapter uses the ruling of the Court of Appeal/Divisional Court in the joined cases of Interfact and Budimir to discuss the concept and phenomenon of national judicial resistance to the encroachment of European laws (EU and ECHR) into criminal procedure. Having provided a detailed analysis of the case, which distinguishes "substantive" from "rhetorical" resistance, it then proceeds to draw some broader lessons that apply in general to the reception of European laws by national criminal courts .en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.subjectEU lawen
dc.subjectECHRen
dc.subjectjudicial resistanceen
dc.subjectlegal cultureen
dc.subjectsovereigntyen
dc.subjectInterfacten
dc.subjectVideo Recordings Act 1984en
dc.subjectHuman Rights Act 1998en
dc.subjectcriminal procedureen
dc.subjectnational procedural autonomyen
dc.titleCrimes, remedies and videotape; An unhappy encounter with EU law?en
dc.typeBook chapteren
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316156315.013
dc.peerreviewedYesen
dc.funderN/Aen
dc.projectidN/Aen
dc.cclicenceN/Aen
dc.date.acceptance2015-07-13en
dc.researchinstituteInstitute for Evidence-Based Law Reform (IELR)en


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record