Unfair terms, surety transactions and European harmonisation: a crucible of europeanised private law?

De Montfort University Open Research Archive

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kenny, Mel en
dc.contributor.author Devenney, J.
dc.date.accessioned 2012-10-10T14:51:58Z
dc.date.available 2012-10-10T14:51:58Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.citation Kenny, M. and Devenney, J. (2009) Unfair terms, surety transactions and European harmonisation: a crucible of Europeanised private law? Conveyancer & Property Lawyer, 2009 (4), pp. 295-308. en
dc.identifier.issn 0010-8200
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2086/7540
dc.description.abstract This article examines, in the light of Barclays Bank Plc v Kufner, the vexed question of whether the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 cover surety transactions. The authors also urge caution—given the poly-contextual nature of surety transactions—in relation to any EU harmonisation of this area. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Sweet & Maxwell. en
dc.subject Consumer protection en
dc.subject Unfair contract terms en
dc.subject Harmonisation en
dc.subject European Union law en
dc.title Unfair terms, surety transactions and European harmonisation: a crucible of europeanised private law? en
dc.type Article en
dc.ref2014.selected 1365424292_0711160248422_20_2


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record