Unfair terms, surety transactions and European harmonisation: a crucible of europeanised private law?

Browse

dc.contributor.author	Kenny, Mel	en
dc.contributor.author	Devenney, J.
dc.date.accessioned	2012-10-10T14:51:58Z
dc.date.available	2012-10-10T14:51:58Z
dc.date.issued	2009
dc.identifier.citation	Kenny, M. and Devenney, J. (2009) Unfair terms, surety transactions and European harmonisation: a crucible of Europeanised private law? Conveyancer & Property Lawyer, 2009 (4), pp. 295-308.	en
dc.identifier.issn	0010-8200
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2086/7540
dc.description.abstract	This article examines, in the light of Barclays Bank Plc v Kufner, the vexed question of whether the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 cover surety transactions. The authors also urge caution—given the poly-contextual nature of surety transactions—in relation to any EU harmonisation of this area.	en
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.publisher	Sweet & Maxwell.	en
dc.subject	Consumer protection	en
dc.subject	Unfair contract terms	en
dc.subject	Harmonisation	en
dc.subject	European Union law	en
dc.title	Unfair terms, surety transactions and European harmonisation: a crucible of europeanised private law?	en
dc.type	Article	en
dc.ref2014.selected	1365424292_0711160248422_20_2

Files	Size	Format	View
There are no files associated with this item.