Precision, consistency and completeness in early-modern playbook manuscripts: the evidence from Thomas of Woodstock and John a Kent and John a Cumber

De Montfort University Open Research Archive

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Egan, Gabriel en
dc.date.accessioned 2012-10-01T14:30:02Z
dc.date.available 2012-10-01T14:30:02Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.citation Egan, G. (2011) Precision, consistency and completeness in early-modern playbook manuscripts: the evidence from Thomas of Woodstock and John a Kent and John a Cumber. The Library: the transactions of the Bibliographical Society, 12 (4), pp. 376 - 391. en
dc.identifier.issn 1744-8581
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2086/7444
dc.description.abstract In three influential essays of the 1980s, William B. Long challenged the standard New Bibliographical characterization of early-modern promptbooks and established a new othodoxy (Long 1985b; Long 1985a; Long 1989). Contrary to the assertions of W. W. Greg and others, Long argued, the play manuscripts used in the early-modern theatres, called promptbooks by New Bibliographers, could be sloppy. Long's essays have been widely received as successful attacks on the New Bibliography.1 According to Long, the vague, permissive, or self-contradictory stage directions that appeared in a dramatist's manuscript were not necessarily tidied for the convenience of the prompter, and no systematic effort was made to regularize inconsistent speech prefixes that gave multiple names for one character. Because such authorial peccadilloes were acceptable to performers, Long argued, the author's manuscript itself (rather than a fresh transcript of it) could normally serve as the document that regulated the performance as it happened. en
dc.language English en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Oxford Journals © the author en
dc.relation.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/library/12.4.376 en
dc.title Precision, consistency and completeness in early-modern playbook manuscripts: the evidence from Thomas of Woodstock and John a Kent and John a Cumber en
dc.type Article en
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/library/12.4.376
dc.researchgroup English Research Group en
dc.peerreviewed Yes en
dc.ref2014.selected 1365776196_0411521243999_29_4


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record