Developing Assessment Practices in Politics

De Montfort University Open Research Archive

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Blair, Alasdair en
dc.contributor.author McGinty, Sam en
dc.date.accessioned 2012-07-13T10:08:20Z
dc.date.available 2012-07-13T10:08:20Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.citation Blair, A. and McGinty S. (2012) Developing Assessment Practices in Politics. In: Simon Lightfoot and Cathy Gormley-Heenan (eds) Teaching Politics and International Relations. Palgrave, pp.105-122, en
dc.identifier.isbn 9781137003393
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2086/6361
dc.description.abstract Up until the early 1990s the traditional approach to teaching and learning in Politics was to use examinations and essays as the primary method of assessing students. This was somewhat in contrast to other subject-based disciplines, such as the Sciences, where the nature of the discipline necessitated the use of a wider pattern of assessment, including class-based tests in the form of laboratory work. Other subjects, such as Business Studies, tended to make greater use of work placements and case studies. Over the last two decades there has been a steady expansion in research on teaching and learning from a Politics perspective, with a considerable focus being attached to the dissemination of different approaches to teaching and learning. This chapter draws on one aspect of this work by focussing on the importance of the assessment regime in the teaching of Politics. In doing so, it draws on the work of a National Teaching Fellowship Scheme (NTFS) project, “It’s Good to Talk: Feedback, Dialogue and Learning” that seeks to identify, evaluate, develop and promote ways to improve feedback to students within the disciplines of History and Politics/International Relations. At the centre of the project is the issue of encouraging teacher and peer dialogue around learning by drawing on feedback approaches in three Universities: De Montfort University, London Metropolitan University, and the University of Warwick. The chapter proceeds as follows. First, it reviews the context of assessment within the teaching and learning of Politics. Second, it analyses the significance of assessment. Third, it investigates different types of assessment. Fourth, it examines the importance of assessment feedback for students. Finally, it presents a concluding argument that a central feature of any method of assessment should be the objective of developing student engagement in ‘deep’ rather than ‘surface’ learning. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Palgrave en
dc.subject assessment and feedback en
dc.subject teaching and learning in Politics en
dc.title Developing Assessment Practices in Politics en
dc.type Book chapter en
dc.peerreviewed Yes en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record