'Feminism rules! Now, where’s my swimsuit?' Re-evaluating Feminist Discourse in Print Media 1968-2008

De Montfort University Open Research Archive

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mendes, Kaitlynn en
dc.date.accessioned 2012-07-11T09:56:42Z
dc.date.available 2012-07-11T09:56:42Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.citation Mendes, K. (2012) ‘Feminism rules! Now, where’s my swimsuit?’ Re-evaluating Feminist Discourse in Print Media 1968-2008. Media, Culture & Society, 34 (5), pp. 554-570 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2086/6339
dc.description.abstract More than forty years after the Second Wave feminist movement emerged in the Western world, it is frequently claimed that feminism is “dead” or redundant, and that we now live in a “postfeminist” society. Although such claims are regularly refuted by a range of academics and activists (Baumgardner and Richards, 2001; Lumby, 2011; McRobbie, 2007; National Organisation for Women, 2011; Smith, 2003; Redfern and Aune, 2010; Tasker and Negra, 2007; Thornham and Weissmann, forthcoming; Valenti, 2007; Walby, 2011; Walter, 2010), it is worthwhile interrogating the extent to which feminism is discussed in popular and political contexts. In light of the persistent and longstanding “backlash” against feminism in Britain and the United States (see Faludi, 1992; Author Removed, 2011a), is it reasonable to assume that discussions of feminism and discourses utilizing feminist concepts, language and critiques are absent? Furthermore, what does the presence – or erasure – of discourses of feminism tell us about its standing today, and how might such discourses have shifted over time? In answering these questions, this paper traces the emergence of, and changes in the ways feminism has been discursively constructed in British and American newspapers during two periods – 1968-82 which I define as the “height” of the Second Wave in both countries, and 2008, a period marking 40 years after the movement began gaining momentum. Through analysing four British (The Times, Daily Mirror, Daily Mail, The Guardian) and American (The New York Times, Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, Washington Times) newspapers, I argue that not only has there been an erasure of feminist activism from our newspapers over time, but that discourses of feminism have become both de-politicised and de-radicalised since the 1960s, and can now largely be considered neoliberal in nature – a problematic construction for those seeking collective social change. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Media, Culture and Society en
dc.subject Feminism en
dc.subject postfeminism en
dc.subject second-wave feminism en
dc.subject discourse analysis en
dc.subject Britain en
dc.subject United States en
dc.subject representation en
dc.subject newspapers en
dc.title 'Feminism rules! Now, where’s my swimsuit?' Re-evaluating Feminist Discourse in Print Media 1968-2008 en
dc.type Article en
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163443712442701
dc.researchgroup Media Discourse Group en
dc.peerreviewed Yes en

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record