Analysing cultural policy: incorrigbly plural or ontologically incompatible?

De Montfort University Open Research Archive

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gray, Clive
dc.date.accessioned 2010-06-04T11:26:11Z
dc.date.available 2010-06-04T11:26:11Z
dc.date.issued 2010-05
dc.identifier.citation Gray, C. (2010) Analysing cultural policy: incorrigbly plural or ontologically incompatible? The International Journal of Cultural Policy, 16 (2), pp. 215-230. en
dc.identifier.issn 1028-6632
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2086/3853
dc.description.abstract Approaches to the study of cultural policy are currently tied to particular disciplines. This can lead to a failure to appreciate the real differences between these disciplines in terms of what they are investigating, and how they go about these investigations. The differences that exist at ontological, epistemological and methodological levels between differing disciplines mean that it is not possible to simply adopt what each discipline is saying about cultural policy at face value. Without greater theoretical and methodological understanding of the tools that are available for the analysis of cultural policy it is unlikely that a more sophisticated approach to analysis will be generated. The consequences of this for both the analysis of cultural policy and future directions of analysis in the field are discussed. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Routledge en
dc.title Analysing cultural policy: incorrigbly plural or ontologically incompatible? en
dc.type Article en
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10286630902935160
dc.peerreviewed Yes en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record