Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArvanitis, Alexiosen
dc.contributor.authorKalliris, Konstantinosen
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-01T14:39:52Z
dc.date.available2018-11-01T14:39:52Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-04
dc.identifier.citationArvanitis, A. and Kalliris, K. (2017) A self-determination theory account of self-authorship: Implications for law and public policy, Philosophical Psychology, 30 (6), pp. 763-783en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2086/17002
dc.descriptionThe file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.en
dc.description.abstractSelf-authorship has been established as the basis of an influential liberal principle of legislation and public policy. Being the author of one’s own life is a significant component of one’s own well-being, and therefore is better understood from the viewpoint of the person whose life it is. However, most philosophical accounts, including Raz’s conception of self-authorship, rely on general and abstract principles rather than specific, individual psychological properties of the person whose life it is. We elaborate on the principles of self-authorship on the basis of self-determination theory, an empirically based psychological theory that has been at the forefront of the study of autonomy and self-authorship for more than 45 years. Our account transcends distinctions between positive and negative freedom and attempts to pinpoint the exact properties of self-authorship within the psychological processes of intrinsic motivation and internalization. If a primary objective of public policy is to support self-authorship, then it should be devised on the basis of how intrinsic motivation and internalization can be properly supported. Self-determination theory identifies three basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. The satisfaction of these needs is associated with the support and growth of intrinsic tendencies and the advancement of well-being. Through this analysis, we can properly evaluate the significance of rationality, basic goods, and the availability of options to self-authorship. Implications for law and policy are discussed with an emphasis on legal paternalism and what many theorists call “liberal perfectionism,” that is, the non-coercive support and promotion of the good life.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.titleA self-determination theory account of self-authorship: Implications for law and public policyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2017.1307333
dc.peerreviewedYesen
dc.funderN/Aen
dc.projectidN/Aen
dc.cclicenceCC-BY-NC-NDen
dc.date.acceptance2017-01-23en
dc.researchinstituteInstitute for Evidence-Based Law Reform (IELR)en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record