Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCoeckelbergh, Marken
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-24T14:40:20Z
dc.date.available2018-10-24T14:40:20Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationCoeckelbergh, M. (2017) Quantification Machines and Artificial Agents in Global Finance: Historical-Phenomenological Perspectives from Philosophy and Sociology of Technology and Money. In: Ippoliti, E. and Chen, P. (eds.). Methods and Finance. A Unifying View on Finance, Mathematics and Philosophy. Cham: Springer, pp. 169-178en
dc.identifier.isbn9783319498713
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2086/16829
dc.description.abstractThis paper raises questions regarding the societal, cultural, and ethical significance of finance, mathematics, and financial-mathematical technologies, discussing in particular the phenomenon of quantification as mediated by contemporary electronic information and communication technologies (ICTS). It first relates the history of mathematics to the history of financial technologies, and argues, inspired by Simmel and Marcuse, that from ancient times to now there seems to be an evolution towards increasing quantification not only in finance, accounting, etc., but in modern society in general. It shows that scientific and technological changes have social and ethical consequences, as quantification creates more distance between people. The paper then analyzes and discusses current shifts of financial agency that exemplify what seems to be a moment of hyper-quantification through the use of ICTs: experiences of "the market" as an independent agent and monez machines as artificial agents in high frequency trading---perhaps the only agents still able to cope with the data.loaded and hyper-quantified world we live in. The paper concludes that while we must acknowledge the human character of finance and mathematics, there are real humans and social consequences of quantification, in ancient times and today, for society and responsibility. It is therefore misleading to assume that financial technologies and mathematics are ethically neutral; more analysis of ethical and societal aspects is needed, also from an "outside" perspective.en
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.subjectQuantificationen
dc.subjectEthics of financeen
dc.subjectSociology of financeen
dc.subjectPhilosophy of financeen
dc.subjectMathematicsen
dc.subjectArtificial agentsen
dc.subjectPhenomenologyen
dc.subjectSimmelen
dc.subjectMarcuseen
dc.subjectResponsibilityen
dc.subjectDistanceen
dc.subjectPhilosophy of technology and mediaen
dc.titleQuantification Machines and Artificial Agents in Global Finance: Historical-Phenomenological Perspectives from Philosophy and Sociology of Technology and Moneyen
dc.typeBook chapteren
dc.peerreviewedYesen
dc.funderN/Aen
dc.projectidN/Aen
dc.cclicenceN/Aen
dc.researchinstituteCentre for Computing and Social Responsibility (CCSR)en


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record