Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhitham, Benen
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T12:35:20Z
dc.date.available2017-04-04T12:35:20Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationWhitham, Ben (2016) Seeking asylum from poverty: Contesting the refugee/migrant paradigm. In: Miriam Kennett and Henry Fielgar (eds.), Introducing Migration, Oxford: Green Economics Institute.en
dc.identifier.isbn9781907543210
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2086/14008
dc.description.abstractMedia coverage of people trying to enter the EU from the Middle East, South-East Asia and Africa has, over the last year, made much of the difference between ‘refugees’ or ‘asylum seekers’ on the one hand, and ‘economic migrants’ or simply ‘migrants’ on the other. The argument goes that while the former have legitimacy in fleeing to Europe for protection from the violence of war and persecution, the latter are essentially coming through choice rather than necessity and really ought to stay in their own countries and help to build stronger, more resilient economies. Politicians from across the mainstream political spectrum have also bought into this discursive framing, with David Cameron talking of a ‘swarm’ and ‘bunch of migrants’ and Jeremy Corbyn and other figures on the left emphasising that ‘refugees’ are welcome in the UK. Both sides of the debate seem to accept the distinction between these two categories of traveller arriving on Europe’s shores; an ontological and moral distinction between the refugee and the migrant. This paper explores the basis of the distinction between refugees and migrants and employs the concept of structural violence – as developed in particular by Johan Galtung and Slavoj Žižek – to argue that the distinction cannot hold. Through a critical analysis of what the refugee/migrant paradigm discursively achieves, I argue that it should be contested in favour of a hybrid view, wherein it is altogether possible to seek asylum or refuge from the ‘structural’ violence of poverty with the same urgency and moral considerations at stake as in cases of people fleeing the ‘direct’ violence of war, detention, torture and persecution. This argument is rooted in a postcolonial view of global political economy. I conclude that we cannot make a meaningful moral or ethical distinction between ‘migrants’ and ‘refugees’ and that this explanatory paradigm and binaristic discursive representation must therefore be vigorously contested.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherGreen Economics Instituteen
dc.subjectmigrationen
dc.subjectrefugee crisisen
dc.subjectpovertyen
dc.titleSeeking asylum from poverty: Contesting the refugee/migrant paradigmen
dc.typeBook chapteren
dc.peerreviewedNoen
dc.explorer.multimediaNoen
dc.funderN/Aen
dc.projectidN/Aen
dc.cclicenceN/Aen
dc.date.acceptance2016-04-29en
dc.researchinstituteMedia Discourse Centre (MDC)en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record