Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMackay, R.en
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-07T13:34:34Z
dc.date.available2017-03-07T13:34:34Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-06
dc.identifier.citationMackay, R. (2017) Case Comment R v Golds. Archbold Review 4-5en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2086/13450
dc.description.abstractA critical discussion of the Supreme Court's decision on diminished responsibility in R v Goldsen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSweet & Maxwellen
dc.subjectCase Comment on R v Goldsen
dc.titleCase Comment R v Goldsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.peerreviewedNoen
dc.explorer.multimediaNoen
dc.funderN/Aen
dc.projectidN/Aen
dc.cclicenceN/Aen
dc.date.acceptance2016-12-23en
dc.researchinstituteInstitute for Evidence-Based Law Reform (IELR)en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record