Evidence based or evidence buried? How far have the implications of the national impact study of the work of Connexions with young people at risk informed the Green Paper?

De Montfort University Open Research Archive

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hoggarth, E.
dc.contributor.author Payne, Malcolm
dc.date.accessioned 2009-03-17T16:36:28Z
dc.date.available 2009-03-17T16:36:28Z
dc.date.issued 2004-12-01
dc.identifier.citation Hoggarth, E. and Payne, M. (2004) Evidence based or evidence buried? – How far have the implications of the national impact study of the work of Connexions with young people at risk informed the Green Paper? Youth and Policy, 90, pp. 43-58. en
dc.identifier.issn 0262-9798
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2086/1306
dc.description This jointly-authored article develops the arguments of the Connexions Impact Study (DfES Research Report 607) to make it accessible for practitioners, service providers and policy makers. It explores key conceptual themes underlying the development of Connexions; and it identifies the importance of building trust and appropriate responses to young people’s orientations. It also draws attention to the multi-faceted nature of impact and the concept of ‘impact leakage’. This is an important finding for those involved in policy review and development. There was equal contribution from both authors to this paper. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject RAE 2008 en
dc.subject UoA 40 Social Work and Social Policy & Administration en
dc.title Evidence based or evidence buried? How far have the implications of the national impact study of the work of Connexions with young people at risk informed the Green Paper? en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record