The Method of Levels of Abstraction in Pluralism and Governance of Dialogical Interaction
This paper deploys elements of the philosophy of information (PoI) in order to explore ideas of dialogical governance. Dialogue in the governance of contentious issues is at least partly a response to the recognition of pluralism among perspectives on various issues. This recognition is prevalent in the context of European governance. However, it is a first step to a better understanding of diverging opinion, rather than an end point. This paper argues that the PoI offers a fruitful path to follow up this first step. Specifically, PoI provides epistemological tools that can be used to clarify the meanings of terms and relevance of perspectives at issue in dialogical scenarios. Importantly, this approach revises the enlightenment view of the individual, offering a more nuanced and ultimately more accurate view of the self as internally complex. This represents a step beyond the status quo wherein these things are taken as unproblematic. This paper argues that PoI’s resources ought to feature as a methodological background to a reinvigorated dialogical governance paradigm. This method and these resources can inform an improved view of dialogical governance in Europe and, in their generality, beyond.
This article points out a parallel between concepts at work in the philosophy of information and others in the service of governance strategies.
Citation : Rainey, S. (2014) The Method of Levels of Abstraction in Pluralism and Governance of Dialogical Interaction. Topoi, 35 (1), pp. 191-201
Research Group : Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility
Peer Reviewed : Yes